\documentstyle[a4,psfig,12pt]{article}
%\setlength{\textwidth}{6.375 true in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.000 true in}
\setlength{\textheight}{655 pt}
%\pagestyle{empty}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
\newcommand{\cc }{$^{12}$C}
\newcommand{\cstar }{$^{12}$C*}
\newcommand{\oo }{$^{16}$O}
\newcommand{\mg }{$^{24}$Mg}
\newcommand{\na }{$^{23}$Na}
\newcommand{\be }{$^{8}$Be}
\newcommand{\si }{$^{28}$Si}
\newcommand{\neon }{$^{20}$Ne}
\newcommand{\he }{$^{4}$He}
\newcommand{\al }{$\alpha $}
\newcommand{\gam }{$\gamma $--ray}
\newcommand{\degree }{$^\circ $}
\newcommand{\action }[1]{\hfill \fbox{#1}}
\begin{document}

\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
\noindent
\begin{picture}(0,0)
\put(0,2.5){\makebox(0,0)[l]{CH/Meet/94/02}}   %% Reference number of document
\end{picture}

\noindent
\begin{minipage}[t]{10cm}
\fbox{
\parbox[t]{5cm}{
{\large {\bf Minutes}}\\[2mm]
Charissa Group Meeting
}}\\[7mm]
\makebox[3.5cm][l]{Meeting held on:} 23 February 1994\\[2mm]            % Date
\makebox[3.5cm][l]{Meeting held at:} Birmingham \\[2mm]     % Place
\end{minipage}
\hfill \raisebox{-2.5cm}{
\psfig{figure=char-encap.ps,height=3cm}}\\[2mm]

\begin{center} \begin{tabular}{l@{~~}l} \hline
~\\								% Present
\makebox[2.5cm][l]{Present:} & \parbox[t]{12cm}{
BRF(Chair),WNC,NMC,MF,GJG,SJAH,CDJ,\\WDMR,GT,RPW,DLW
}\\
~\\								% Apologies
\makebox[2.5cm][l]{Apologies:} & \parbox[t]{12cm}{
RAC,RAH,JSL,ACM,VP,JK
}\\
~\\								% Distribution
\makebox[2.5cm][l]{Distribution:} & \parbox[t]{12cm}{
Those above plus  DDW, all by e-mail/file-server.
}\\
~\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
~\\[0.5cm]
%\addtolength{\headheight}{2.5cm}
{\large {\bf Minutes}} \\[0.5cm]

\begin{enumerate}

\item	 {\bf Minutes of meeting of 5 January 1994:} accepted

\item	 {\bf Matters Arising/ Actions:}

All actions were reviewed and covered satisfactorily. Matters not arising later:
\begin{itemize}

\item	 {\it Item 4(a)[v]: ~} 
MEGHA module may not be tested prior to shipment.

\item	 {\it Item 4(c)[vi]:} 
The report on PSD tests exists, but is still to be circulated as a
Charissa report. \action{DLW,WNC}
\end{itemize}



\item	 {\bf Update on NPC/SERC matters:} 

Our grant application appears to have been favourably
received by the NPC and we can hope for a reasonable level of
funding in the new grant period.

Grant details will probably be finalised at the next NPC meeting on 8 March.
The new grants commence on 1 Oct 1994, administered by the EPSRC.



\item	 {\bf Progress with MEGHA development:} 
\begin{enumerate}
\item	 {\em Prototype Module:}
 DLW tabled photographs of the completed prototype
module. Scintillator mounts had required small changes because not all crystals
satisfied the tolerances. 
A mount for the module in the 2m chamber at the ANU was complete.
Grids were still to come from DL. All gas and scintillator signals, and
signals from 1 or possibly 2 silicon detectors will be recorded in the ANU 
tests.
\item	 {\em Chamber Design:}
 a MEGHA meeting had been held, and S. Metcalf was
laying out a modified design for the main chamber, to allow for strip
detectors to be mounted at 15cm from the target. This would be discussed at
a further meeting on 2 March. Plans would be circulated to the collaboration
for comment, before detailed design proceeded.
\item	 {\em Detectors:}
 Bids had been received from Hamamatsu, Micron, Q--Par Angus
and Intertechnique (Gresham Power Electronics). Canberra had been approached
but had not expressed an interest. All were ion-implanted except Q--Par
(surface barrier). The combination of performance, price and delivery
presently favour Hamamatsu. 

Intertechnique had suggested joint development work on design of sheet PSD's.

Tests of the Hamamatsu detector at the ANU would require Charissa amplifiers
modified to 10$\mu $s time constants. The implications of signal arrival and
generation times on the triggering would need to be considered.

After discussion, it was {\bf agreed} to proceed with the purchase of one 
consignment
of fifty 385$\mu $m thick detectors from Hamamatsu (\pounds 81K plus
\pounds 14K tooling). Delivery should be by mid-June. \action{BRF}

Annealing of existing detectors was suggested by WNC, and it was {\bf agreed}
that
projects to investigate controlled heating would be initiated at Birmingham,
involving GRK.
(See also Item 11.) \action{GT}

The thickness of dead layers in the strip and sheet PSD detectors was
discussed. Some had been measured by alpha sources, others inferred from
off-line analysis of reaction data. Details of these results and inferences
should be circulated. DLW (S. Chappell) to collate and circulate.
\\ \mbox{} \action{DLW,WDMR,MF}

\item	 {\em Gas Supply:} this work was progressing as a lower priority.
\end{enumerate}

\item	 {\bf Progress with electronics:}
\begin{enumerate}
\item	{\em Preamplifiers:} 
DLW reported. Tests of the silicon and gas preamps from 
Oxford were completed at York. Beam tests at ANU planned for April.

Quotes had been received for the main manufacture. For 500 preamps, component
costs were \pounds 3.5K, which breaks down to \pounds 7 per preamp board,
\pounds 8 per motherboard and \pounds 21 for filtering/coupling boards.

Overall, the price per preamp channel would be approximately \pounds 10.

\item	{\em Amplifiers:} WDMR reported. A sketch layout of the new amplifiers
was complete. Pairs of amplifiers would be housed in double-height single-width
modules: a total of 160 modules for 320 channels. Shaping time was 2$\mu $s.
Gain, threshold and pole-zero were computer controlled with manual option.
Switching used mercury relays. The sample-hold (or integrator) circuit plugged
in at the back.

Any suggestions for changes in design should be notified urgently. \action{ALL}

\item	{\em Power Supplies:} DLW reported. Main units were 90\% complete, with
power supplies underway. Programming was complete. Aiming to test at the ANU
in April.
\end{enumerate}

\item	 {\bf Progress with Data Acquisition:}
\begin{enumerate}
\item	{\em ANU running March/April 1994:}
	The development of the  FETCH module had given some 
	difficulties, but was  on schedule for March shipment. New
	system to be tested in Oxford by 4 March.  \action{SJAH,RAH}

	The new TDC-based energy/timing system for 32 channels is proceeding
	slower than hoped. There will be 16 channels ready for March/April.
	It was {\bf agreed} that the tests should employ the existing TDC units
	rather than the Lecroy 2277 units eventually to be incorporated.

\item	{\em Other Developments:} it was {\bf agreed} that the April tests
	should be assessed rapidly and a recommendation made on the suitability
	of the time conversion and TDC-based system. \action{MF,RAH}

	It was {\bf agreed} that the next Charissa meeting should consider
	the April results and make a final decision on ADC purchases within
	the existing grant period.
\end{enumerate}

\item	 {\bf Status of plans for ANU running March/April 1994:}
	DLW reported that accommodation was booked for all participants,
	and shipping arrangements were proceeding. 

	Equipment at Surrey that requires shipment should be 
	sent to York. \action{GJG}

	Targets  to be  ordered from Daresbury for both  York and
	Surrey runs.   \action{CDJ}

	The strip detector stocks were reviewed. At the ANU: 6 used and 6
	un-used Micron plus 3 Hamamatsu (some Micron detectors 1mm). To go
	with York personnel this time: 9 new Hamamatsu detectors.
	(See also Item 11.) \action{DLW}

	There would be no simultaneous two-tape writing of data on-line, so an
	efficient tape copying procedure was required. \action{SJAH}

	SJAH reported that an off-line sorting facility on the Solaris system
	would be available, employing display routines by SJAH and S. Singer.

	An example  FORTRAN sort code should be sent to GJG \& CDJ.
	 \action{SJAH}

	A copy of the parameter file and any other available details for 
	software setting od ADC thresholds should be forwarded to GJG and
	DLW. \action{SJAH}

	NMC reported that two ribbon-conhex distribution boxes for driving
	double strip-detectors were complete. A copy of the circuit should
	be forwarded to WNC to go on the file-server. \action{NMC}

	NMC reported that two new distribution boxes for single strip-detectors
	were nearing completion, and would need to be taken in hand luggage.
	\action{GJG}


\newpage
\item	 {\bf Provisional plans for ANU running July 1994:}\\
	(correction from Agenda: should read July 1994 not August).

	BRF tabled a discussion document outlining the proposed running
	period. This suggested the departure of equipment and personnel on
	17 and 23 June, setting-up beginning 27 June and beam-time on
	4 July. The Brisbane conference of the Australian Physical Society
	is in the week beginning 4 July. 

	Details of the experiments were discussed, and discussion would
	continue.
	An updated version of the tabled document should go on the
	file-server as Ch/Doc/94/05. \action{BRF,WNC}


\item	 {\bf Status of Strasbourg Developments:}

	BRF reported that the formal agreement covering the relocation of the
	Charissa beamline from the NSF to the Vivitron would be re-drafted.
	This follows a meeting in Strasbourg on 6 January (Ch/Doc/94/01)
	at which several details were clarified. JSL will liaise with 
	Strasbourg personnel. The beamline and chamber were expected to be
	installed and available for approved experiments by December 1994.

\item	 {\bf Spend on Grants:}

	BRF tabled informal notes suggesting a breakdown for the current
	spend requirements between universities. There were no significant
	difficulties with the suggested scheme. It was {\bf agreed} to make
	final decisions on the spend at the next Charissa meeting. \action{BRF}


\item	 {\bf Detector Stocks:}

	Detector stocks had been discussed briefly under Item 7. Further to
	this, RPW reported that there were 7 used Micron strip detectors at
	Birmingham. Thicknesses were 300, 500 and 1000$\mu $m. One of these
	would be sent to Surrey for use in tests. \action{GJG}\\
	Some others could be used for the tests discussed under Item 4.3.	


\item	 {\bf SOPHIE and the SHEILAS:}

	NMC introduced a document (Ch/Doc/94/06) outlining some ideas for
	detecting gamma-rays from reactions producing cluster states, where
	these cluster states had previously been investigated by the
	collaboration using just charged particle measurements. Various
	possible approaches were considered, and it was agreed that these
	should be explored further.

\item	 {\bf Publications and Talks:} 

Contributions to the forthcoming IOP Conference would come from JSP,NC and PMS
(York and Surrey personnel away in Canberra).

The papers in the following table were discussed and   agreed.

\mbox{} \hspace*{-\parindent}
\begin{tabular}{l|c|p{6cm}|c} \hline
Experiment	& Analysis & Description and Aims & 
					\fbox{{\sf ACTION}} \\ \hline
~ & ~ & ~ & ~ \\
\na\ data	& NSJ	& PRC paper		& DLW \\
\oo\ target	& CDJ	& PRC paper		& CDJ \\
Texas data	& JTM	& Brief paper, consider linking to MJL data & BRF \\
Higher E$_x$ \mg\ & MJL  & Brief paper, but see previous & BRF \\
Band termination & SPF	& Brief report; see next & DLW \\
Spin at low E$_{beam}$ & CDJ & Overlaps GJG paper; possibly absorb
			with previous.		& CDJ \\
\mg + \mg	& AStJM & Aim to set limit on $3\times $\oo & on hold \\
7--\al		& PMS	& Resolve anomaly, report at IOP, finish sorting
			by July and start Letter or Brief Report then & WDMR \\
\cc +\mg	& SMS	& Sort \oo + \be\ channel by July & WNC \\
LBL \oo + \be\  & JSP & Paper for IOP; possibly write full paper
			in summer & BRF \\
High resolution & NC 	& Widths obtained, no spins. Brief paper. & NMC \\
\cc +\cstar	& RPW 	& analysis needs 12 months & RPW \\
Ang distribution & SPC & recoil ambiguities and statistics problems;
			maybe indicates forward peaking; discuss further & DLW\\
Leddy detector	& MJL & written up in thesis & BRF \\
Hybrid technical & NC,SMS & Data from first ANU running & NMC,WNC \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

\item	 {\bf Any Other Business:}
\begin{enumerate}
\item	{\em Charged Particle Working Party:} BRF reminded everyone of the 
	meeting at Daresbury on
	2 March to decide the need (or not) for a CPWP. \action{ALL}
\item	{\em ANU talks:} MF, SC and SMS would give talks at ANU research 
	meetings during the next visit. \action{MF,DLW,WNC}
\item	{\em Hybrid Efficiencies:} GJG and SPF should meet with MF at
	Birmingham to discuss hybrid detector efficiencies. \action{GJG,DLW,MF}
\end{enumerate}


\item	 {\bf Date of Next Meeting:}
	11.30 a.m., Wednesday, 27 April 1994 \\ \mbox{} \hfill in 
			Birmingham. \hfill \mbox{}


\end{enumerate}


\vfill
W.N. Catford, Secretary.\hfill
March 1, 1994  (released \today )

\end{document}















